Gå til hovedinnhold

From care to carry – the line between empathy and self-erasure

Norsk tekst etter den engelske
Carl Gustav Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist and founder of analytical psychology, was deeply concerned with the inner landscape of the human being – especially how we project our own unconscious parts onto others. A central part of his thinking involves the boundary between you and me, between support and control, between empathy and self-erasure.


In a time when-“being there for others” is often seen as a moral ideal, we may need a timely reminder: there is a limit where care turns into something that harms both the giver and the receiver. This article presents five psychological boundaries inspired by Jung, to help us recognize when we go from care to carry –and why it should be avoided.


Don't be a superhero. Hero is enough in your own life.

1. Don’t take responsibility for someone else’s life tasks

When we constantly try to solve other people’s problems, we rob them of the opportunity to grow. Jung believed that individuation – the process of becoming whole – requires us to own our own darkness and challenges. If you keep clearing the path for someone else, you block their development.

You can support, but not walk the road for them.

2. Don’t get pulled into other people’s emotional chaos

Empathy is essential, but there’s a difference between feeling with someone – and losing yourself in their emotional turmoil. Being a supportive presence is not the same as becoming an emotional dumping ground.

You can listen, but you must not drown.

3. Don’t carry others’ pain as if it were your own

Many of us feel guilt or anxiety when someone we love is in pain. But taking on their pain – emotionally or practically – makes you ill and leaves them powerless. Jung would say you are projecting your own fear of chaos and helplessness onto them.

You can be near, but you must not become a container for others’ suffering.

4. Don’t save others at the cost of yourself

The urge to “fix” someone else can stem from an unconscious shadow – a desire to feel valuable or indispensable. But true help happens when the other person takes responsibility, and you don’t lose yourself in the process.

You can show the way, but not carry them there.

5. Don’t give more than what is healthy for you

Generosity without boundaries becomes self-sacrifice. When you give more than you have strength for – time, energy, presence – you deplete yourself. Jung believed that balance is necessary to preserve the integrity of the self.

You can give, but not empty yourself.

A necessary distinction

Being an empathetic person does not mean you must be a rescue tool for everyone around you. 

Jung helps us see that there is a deeper form of care in allowing others to own their pain, find their path, and take their responsibility. Your role is to be whole – not to break yourself into pieces to hold others together.

Andres mørke tankar, ikkje la dei bli dine.

Frå omsorg til å bere andre si bør
Grensa mellom empati og å miste seg sjølv

Carl Gustav Jung, den sveitsiske psykiateren og grunnleggjaren av analytisk psykologi, var opptatt av det indre livet i mennesket – særleg korleis vi ofte legg våre eigne ubevisste sider over andre. Ein viktig del av tankegangen hans handlar om grensa mellom meg og deg, mellom det å støtte og det å ta over, mellom empati og sjølvutsletting.

I ei tid der det å vere der for andre blir sett som noko av det finaste vi kan gjere, treng vi kanskje ein viktig påminning: Det finst ei grense der omsorga ikkje lenger hjelp, men i staden blir ei belastning – både for deg og for den andre. Her er fem punkt, inspirert av Jung, som kan minne oss om når vi går frå omsorg (care) til å bere (carry)og kvifor det kan vere lurt å stoppe opp.

1. Ikkje ta over ansvaret til andre

Når vi stadig prøver å løyse problema til andre, tek vi frå dei sjansen til å lære og utvikle seg. Jung meinte at kvar enkelt si eiga reise og ta eigarskap til det som er vanskeleg. Om du ryddar vegen for dei, får dei aldri øve seg å sjølve.

Du kan støtte, men ikkje i staden for dei.

2. Ikkje la deg bli sugd inn i andres kjensle-kaos

Empati er viktig, men det er forskjell å vere medkjensleleg – og å bli overskylja av andres kjensler. Du skal vere der, men du også passe deg sjølv.

Du kan lytte, men du treng ikkje drukne.

3. Ikkje bær andres smerte som om ho var di eiga

Det er naturleg å kjenne med andre når dei har det vanskeleg. Men viss du tek over smerta deira og gjer henne til di, blir både du og dei utmatta. Du kan vere nær, men det er ikkje di oppgåve å bære alt.

Du kan vere med, men du treng ikkje ta alt deg.

4. Ikkje gløym deg sjølv i ønsket om å hjelpe

Mange av oss har eit sterkt behov for å vere nyttige, og det er fint. Men om du mister deg sjølv i forsøk å fikse andre, gir du meir enn du har. Den beste hjelpa skjer når folk får ansvar for sitt eige liv – og du får behalde ditt.

Du kan vise retning, men ikkje dra dei framover.

5. Ikkje gi meir enn det du har å gi

Det er flott å vere raus, men også rausheit treng grenser. Når du gir meir enn du tåler, tappar du deg sjølv. Det er lov å sette grenser – også når du bryr deg.

Du kan gi, men ikkje tømme deg sjølv.

Ei viktig grense

Å vere eit empatisk menneske betyr ikkje at du vere redningsplanken for alle rundt deg. 

Jung minner oss om at ekte omsorg handlar om å støtte – ikkje å ta over. Du skal vere heil, også medan du er der for andre.




Populære innlegg fra denne bloggen

The 20 Most Natural Resource-Rich Countries in the World (early 2025)

Rich countries  Norsk etter engelsk tekst The value of a country's natural resources – such as oil , gas, minerals , timber , and precious metals – is a key factor for both economic strength and geopolitical power. Some countries possess enormous values underground, but they exploit them differently, depending on their governance, infrastructure, and institutional capacity. Based on updated figures from 2024–2025 ( Visual Capitalist , Investopedia , World Population Review , etc.), below are the twenty countries with the highest estimated resource value – as well as population and geographic size. Cfr. figures before 2024 Rank Country Resource Value (bn USD) Population (millions) Area (million km²) 1 Russia 75,000 146 17.10 2 USA 45,000 347 9.15 3 Saudi Arabia 34,000 34.6 2.15 4 Canada 33,000 40.1 9.09 5 Iran 27,300 88 1.65 6 China 23,000 1,408 9.60 7 Brazil 22,000 213 8.36 8 Australia 20,000 26 7.69 9 Iraq 16,0...

Freedom of belief and freedom of religion – a contradiction?

In public debate and human rights documents, the terms freedom of belief and freedom of religion are often used interchangeably. But if we distinguish between the two in the following way – that freedom of belief is the individual's right to believe what they want , while freedom of religion is the right to shape others’ beliefs into rules and rituals – then an interesting discussion opens up about a potential conflict between the individual and the collective. Norwegian  text - after the  English  text Freedom of belief – the individual’s right to believe Freedom of belief, in this sense, concerns each person’s inner world – the right to think, believe, interpret and view the world in one’s own way. This right is absolute in human rights law. No state, organization, or religion has the right to interfere with what a person thinks, what worldview they hold, or which god they believe in – or whether they believe in any god at all. Freedom of belief protects the pers...

Individual vs Collective

How free is the individual, really? How much space does each person have to think, live and shape their own life? The answer is never simply “everything” or “nothing” – it lies in the intersection between the individual’s inner freedom and the external structures of the collective. The state, religion, work, and family – these collective institutions shape both our room for possibility and our boundaries. The question is not only what they give, but what they demand. The individual: space for belief, thought, and action Take control over your own thoughts In the article Freedom of Belief and Freedom of Religion , a distinction is drawn between belief as an individual right and religion as a collective structure. Each person has an inviolable right to believe – or not believe – whatever they choose. This concerns inner freedom of conscience, the right to interpret the world on one’s own terms. But once belief becomes organized, institutionalized, and made into a norm, it becomes a pow...