Gå til hovedinnhold

War on Credit

 

How future Value Creators  Finance Today’s Privileged

The Iraq War differs from previous major conflicts by one decisive factor: it was not financed through tax increases, but through loans and tax deductions at the same time. This has created a massive transfer of wealth away from current and future value creators to a privileged elite in the United States of today.

1. Mortgaging Future Value Creation

Often, wars have been financed by the state asking its citizens/workers (the value creators) to contribute more in the "here and now" through war taxes. During the Iraq War, the U.S. chose a different path: they borrowed the money.

This means that the bill was not paid by those living when the war began; instead, it was pushed into the future. Every dollar spent in Iraq is, in reality, a claim against future value creation. When today’s and tomorrow’s workers in the U.S. and other Western nations produce value, a significant portion of this "harvest" is diverted to pay interest and installments on this war debt.

2. Corporations as "Super-Brokers"

In the Iraq War, we saw the emergence of "super-brokers" such as Halliburton (KBR), Blackwater, and Lockheed Martin. These companies functioned as intermediaries between the American taxpayer (the customer) and those performing the work (the value creators—everyone from soldiers to cooks and engineers).

Through so-called "cost-plus" contracts, these brokers were guaranteed a profit regardless of how much they spent. The more money they spent, the more they earned. This is a perversion of the broker role, where the broker no longer seeks efficiency but instead seeks increased volume to extract more value from the customer (the state/value creators).

3. The "Harvest" of the Privileged Sector

Where did the money go? The harvest from this war ended up largely within the privileged sector:

  • Owners and Investors: Shareholders in the defense industry experienced an enormous increase in value.

  • Political Actors: Many of the key architects of the war had close ties to the companies receiving the contracts. This creates a "revolving door" effect where politicians (the privileged sector) facilitate contracts from which they later personally profit through board positions, consultancy roles, or stock interests.

  • The Financial Sector: Since the war was financed with loans, major banks (also part of the privileged sector) have harvested astronomical sums in interest on the national debt.

4. The Breakdown of the Homogeneous Society

A homogeneous income distribution provides the most prosperity and the least crime. The Iraq financing functioned as a reverse redistribution machine:

  • The Value Creators: Are left with the debt and dilapidated public services because tax revenues must go toward repaying loans.

  • The Needy: Experience cuts to social benefits because "the state cannot afford them," while billions are funneled out to private contractors.

  • The Privileged: Have accumulated wealth that detaches them entirely from the rest of society, creating deep social and political divisions.

A Structural Imbalance

The Iraq War was, in practice, a gigantic PCP (Public-Commercial Partnership) where the risk was placed on future value creators/workers, while the profit was extracted immediately by a privileged elite. This is a textbook example of what happens when the broker role (employer/contractor) becomes too powerful and the harvest becomes too skewed.

When the privileged sector can use the power of the state to mortgage future labor for personal gain, the social contract is broken. The result can be an increased crime, social instability, and a weakening of collective prosperity - look to US.



Populære innlegg fra denne bloggen

The 20 Most Natural Resource-Rich Countries in the World (early 2025)

Rich countries  Norsk etter engelsk tekst The value of a country's natural resources – such as oil , gas, minerals , timber , and precious metals – is a key factor for both economic strength and geopolitical power. Some countries possess enormous values underground, but they exploit them differently, depending on their governance, infrastructure, and institutional capacity. Based on updated figures from 2024–2025 ( Visual Capitalist , Investopedia , World Population Review , etc.), below are the twenty countries with the highest estimated resource value – as well as population and geographic size. Cfr. figures before 2024 Rank Country Resource Value (bn USD) Population (millions) Area (million km²) 1 Russia 75,000 146 17.10 2 USA 45,000 347 9.15 3 Saudi Arabia 34,000 34.6 2.15 4 Canada 33,000 40.1 9.09 5 Iran 27,300 88 1.65 6 China 23,000 1,408 9.60 7 Brazil 22,000 213 8.36 8 Australia 20,000 26 7.69 9 Iraq 16,0...

Freedom of belief and freedom of religion – a contradiction?

In public debate and human rights documents, the terms freedom of belief and freedom of religion are often used interchangeably. But if we distinguish between the two in the following way – that freedom of belief is the individual's right to believe what they want , while freedom of religion is the right to shape others’ beliefs into rules and rituals – then an interesting discussion opens up about a potential conflict between the individual and the collective. Norwegian  text - after the  English  text Freedom of belief – the individual’s right to believe Freedom of belief, in this sense, concerns each person’s inner world – the right to think, believe, interpret and view the world in one’s own way. This right is absolute in human rights law. No state, organization, or religion has the right to interfere with what a person thinks, what worldview they hold, or which god they believe in – or whether they believe in any god at all. Freedom of belief protects the pers...

Individual vs Collective

How free is the individual, really? How much space does each person have to think, live and shape their own life? The answer is never simply “everything” or “nothing” – it lies in the intersection between the individual’s inner freedom and the external structures of the collective. The state, religion, work, and family – these collective institutions shape both our room for possibility and our boundaries. The question is not only what they give, but what they demand. The individual: space for belief, thought, and action Take control over your own thoughts In the article Freedom of Belief and Freedom of Religion , a distinction is drawn between belief as an individual right and religion as a collective structure. Each person has an inviolable right to believe – or not believe – whatever they choose. This concerns inner freedom of conscience, the right to interpret the world on one’s own terms. But once belief becomes organized, institutionalized, and made into a norm, it becomes a pow...